Post by MenelaosGkikas on Apr 11, 2022 20:07:26 GMT
Republished from my Facebook Page, Maker's Dust, November 25, 2021
Dear folks and Jacob Krueger Studio alumni, I’ve always felt that creative inspiration comes from within, from a complex or perhaps a cognitive equivalent of phenomena longing to be put on paper and get to know what exists at the other side. To prevent misunderstandings, this is an ambiguous prediction of mine. As writers we have to argue, to be visionaries, to prove, to persuade or better… to predict. But what happens when words are not enough? There’s an opinion I had listened to at my first steps as a web creator… “If someone else that is not you, tries to create what you created then perhaps there will be lots of surprises”, indicating failure of course. But these are perhaps oracles of the past…
My books are being distributed in the world wide web and right now there’s this crazy feeling of being completely aligned as an individual with the feedback I get, at least as a networker, where many times we’ve experienced the fact (in writing, in the internet, in life) that not all success and luck pass through the doors of marketing and “business hypotheses”. But let me tell you where I’ve got analytically.
To understand a project, a book, an idea and to brand ourselves as creators including our memoir approach, we have to evaluate the environment around them, meaning the understanding of the ecosystem of these ideas as interdependent rings of a big chain…! If there’s one ring missing, we’re done… For example, there’s always been a gentle understanding that the beginning of somebody’s career begins with an acceptance at a university, that we have to develop a pack of qualifications based on that and that there are people born to be leaders if compared with others only serving as cogwheels at a production line, dean’s opinion…! To the point, I can also agree with that acknowledging that it’s the economy of knowledge, creativity and social networks that gave me this label as well.
But of course, the anonymous foolosophers have found other ways of predicting and planning our future… Steve Jobs, Sergey Brin, Zuckerberg, Chase Manhattan… But with this comes the price of what I said above, that I’ve experienced it multi-faceted when I say that not all success and luck pass through a single institution. For the first time I’ve discovered or rather verified that no matter what I have to suggest for my script, If I apply an advice at the extreme and then the analysis shows, we were larger than life… what happened?! Then perhaps the blame is mine.
For example, a drama should not be rotated around cafes. OK but then perhaps we’ve said they have to be larger than life and then twist their fates… Am I working only with my book?! Shouldn’t writers find self-fulfillment in terms of dealing with people’s projections of them? Excellent habit… It’s true that one of the projects with similar structure with The Words of Emily Logan is La La Land, with Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, agreed!! Here’s where movie writing through the medium of literature points out cliché’s but for a reason, that is “Show don’t tell”. Even the art of complicated vocabulary doesn’t mean… the writer wants to bombard the cloud within seconds… Perhaps foreign speakers have to come up with artifacts and descriptions indicating opening a dictionary. How long does this effect last? But in order to make it work there’s structure.
If we’ve learned for example to write simple movie dialogues in 4 pages and a simple literature description only takes one paragraph, as this is also true in many epic successes such as Titanic, Joker, Avatar, then perhaps this means that future scripts will become super complex and multi-dimensional as a result of new structures… But this is a story of collaboration and not schoology! At the end of the day, before data shift from a drive to website approach to in-channel solutions and find out in channel what happens with data, joyful alumni mascots have to encounter Kruger’s killer!! Remember Elysium? Talking about validation and perspective of data. A simple person with a camera and a laptop can produce a movie. The future is fascinating! Wanna know money work?! Work hard and “kill your darlings”…
Dear folks and Jacob Krueger Studio alumni, I’ve always felt that creative inspiration comes from within, from a complex or perhaps a cognitive equivalent of phenomena longing to be put on paper and get to know what exists at the other side. To prevent misunderstandings, this is an ambiguous prediction of mine. As writers we have to argue, to be visionaries, to prove, to persuade or better… to predict. But what happens when words are not enough? There’s an opinion I had listened to at my first steps as a web creator… “If someone else that is not you, tries to create what you created then perhaps there will be lots of surprises”, indicating failure of course. But these are perhaps oracles of the past…
My books are being distributed in the world wide web and right now there’s this crazy feeling of being completely aligned as an individual with the feedback I get, at least as a networker, where many times we’ve experienced the fact (in writing, in the internet, in life) that not all success and luck pass through the doors of marketing and “business hypotheses”. But let me tell you where I’ve got analytically.
To understand a project, a book, an idea and to brand ourselves as creators including our memoir approach, we have to evaluate the environment around them, meaning the understanding of the ecosystem of these ideas as interdependent rings of a big chain…! If there’s one ring missing, we’re done… For example, there’s always been a gentle understanding that the beginning of somebody’s career begins with an acceptance at a university, that we have to develop a pack of qualifications based on that and that there are people born to be leaders if compared with others only serving as cogwheels at a production line, dean’s opinion…! To the point, I can also agree with that acknowledging that it’s the economy of knowledge, creativity and social networks that gave me this label as well.
But of course, the anonymous foolosophers have found other ways of predicting and planning our future… Steve Jobs, Sergey Brin, Zuckerberg, Chase Manhattan… But with this comes the price of what I said above, that I’ve experienced it multi-faceted when I say that not all success and luck pass through a single institution. For the first time I’ve discovered or rather verified that no matter what I have to suggest for my script, If I apply an advice at the extreme and then the analysis shows, we were larger than life… what happened?! Then perhaps the blame is mine.
For example, a drama should not be rotated around cafes. OK but then perhaps we’ve said they have to be larger than life and then twist their fates… Am I working only with my book?! Shouldn’t writers find self-fulfillment in terms of dealing with people’s projections of them? Excellent habit… It’s true that one of the projects with similar structure with The Words of Emily Logan is La La Land, with Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, agreed!! Here’s where movie writing through the medium of literature points out cliché’s but for a reason, that is “Show don’t tell”. Even the art of complicated vocabulary doesn’t mean… the writer wants to bombard the cloud within seconds… Perhaps foreign speakers have to come up with artifacts and descriptions indicating opening a dictionary. How long does this effect last? But in order to make it work there’s structure.
If we’ve learned for example to write simple movie dialogues in 4 pages and a simple literature description only takes one paragraph, as this is also true in many epic successes such as Titanic, Joker, Avatar, then perhaps this means that future scripts will become super complex and multi-dimensional as a result of new structures… But this is a story of collaboration and not schoology! At the end of the day, before data shift from a drive to website approach to in-channel solutions and find out in channel what happens with data, joyful alumni mascots have to encounter Kruger’s killer!! Remember Elysium? Talking about validation and perspective of data. A simple person with a camera and a laptop can produce a movie. The future is fascinating! Wanna know money work?! Work hard and “kill your darlings”…