Post by MenelaosGkikas on Apr 13, 2022 12:35:29 GMT
Republished from my Facebook Page Maker's Dust, March 5 2022
Hello folks, writers and all creatives! RMS Titanic had been Leo’s ticket to Rose…! While it’s a matter of time to finish reading this script, I decided to make this article in terms of discovering common motifs with other stories, including concepts that can affect all of us. The story and the movie of James Cameron is perhaps known to all of you. The narrative patterns and nature of development I analyzed in La La Land is common to the majority of stories or genres that go character deep and don’t deal with direct discussions of consequences or mistakes, even though that’s the role of Rose in terms of her relationships and dead-ends…
In the script as well as the movie it’s portrayed that decades of experience of ship makers as well as businessmen, actually turned against them as a result of bad logic, arrogance and superficial estimations. The words actually of Mr. Andrews was that “he envisioned a steamer so grand in scale, and so luxurious in its appointments, that its supremacy would never be challenged…” At the same dinner Rose discusses with Mr. Ismay and says: “Do you know of Dr. Freud? His ideas about the male preoccupation with size might be of particular interest to you, Mr. Ismay”. Cal discusses on the failure of Picasso and burns bridges by saying that he should mind from now on what Rose reads, as far as Freud is concerned. People who only think in terms of the grandeur of their journey, respecting nothing else but money, are summarized in Cal’s words to Jack later on: “I always win Jack, one way or the other”.
RMS Titanic would be unsinkable, life-saving boats are a waste of space for an unsinkable ship and they all know how to avoid icebergs especially if responsibles wouldn’t be finally at their positions… There’s time for everything… Arguments and logic of people directed by arrogance and lack of attention to details, after all it’s the aristocratic spirit that’s being reflected here including The Heart Of The Oceans, Cal’s gift to Rose. Arguments of magnitude and size are being reflected in many stories. Whether it’s Hollywood, business tycoons, famous actors and acting contrary to the assumption of our times stating “all artists are poor and all businessmen are rich” (as this is actually stated in Rose’s words to Jack discussing what she should be in her life), familiarizing grandeur as well as the psychology of size, should make individuals more aware in terms of the “extensions” of those things to people. Burning bridges, losing balance or finally getting on a high horse by taking things for granted created fatal illusions that ended up in failure of affairs as well as the ship-wreck.
Better say as a conclusion, being more aware of where your own dimensions begin or stop, could e.g. make Cal win in terms of his affair. Psychology shouldn’t be cut off from business and art is a reflection of our culture. As a general canon, the continuous reproduction in language of an aristocracy (and it’s important to find out who believes he/she is such) actually favored Leo’s relationship with Rose, indicating such reproductions failure… Have a great time folks!
Hello folks, writers and all creatives! RMS Titanic had been Leo’s ticket to Rose…! While it’s a matter of time to finish reading this script, I decided to make this article in terms of discovering common motifs with other stories, including concepts that can affect all of us. The story and the movie of James Cameron is perhaps known to all of you. The narrative patterns and nature of development I analyzed in La La Land is common to the majority of stories or genres that go character deep and don’t deal with direct discussions of consequences or mistakes, even though that’s the role of Rose in terms of her relationships and dead-ends…
In the script as well as the movie it’s portrayed that decades of experience of ship makers as well as businessmen, actually turned against them as a result of bad logic, arrogance and superficial estimations. The words actually of Mr. Andrews was that “he envisioned a steamer so grand in scale, and so luxurious in its appointments, that its supremacy would never be challenged…” At the same dinner Rose discusses with Mr. Ismay and says: “Do you know of Dr. Freud? His ideas about the male preoccupation with size might be of particular interest to you, Mr. Ismay”. Cal discusses on the failure of Picasso and burns bridges by saying that he should mind from now on what Rose reads, as far as Freud is concerned. People who only think in terms of the grandeur of their journey, respecting nothing else but money, are summarized in Cal’s words to Jack later on: “I always win Jack, one way or the other”.
RMS Titanic would be unsinkable, life-saving boats are a waste of space for an unsinkable ship and they all know how to avoid icebergs especially if responsibles wouldn’t be finally at their positions… There’s time for everything… Arguments and logic of people directed by arrogance and lack of attention to details, after all it’s the aristocratic spirit that’s being reflected here including The Heart Of The Oceans, Cal’s gift to Rose. Arguments of magnitude and size are being reflected in many stories. Whether it’s Hollywood, business tycoons, famous actors and acting contrary to the assumption of our times stating “all artists are poor and all businessmen are rich” (as this is actually stated in Rose’s words to Jack discussing what she should be in her life), familiarizing grandeur as well as the psychology of size, should make individuals more aware in terms of the “extensions” of those things to people. Burning bridges, losing balance or finally getting on a high horse by taking things for granted created fatal illusions that ended up in failure of affairs as well as the ship-wreck.
Better say as a conclusion, being more aware of where your own dimensions begin or stop, could e.g. make Cal win in terms of his affair. Psychology shouldn’t be cut off from business and art is a reflection of our culture. As a general canon, the continuous reproduction in language of an aristocracy (and it’s important to find out who believes he/she is such) actually favored Leo’s relationship with Rose, indicating such reproductions failure… Have a great time folks!